Articles

Taking Justice and Peace Out of ‘Justice of the Peace’

In civil rights, education, Gay Rights, legal issues/law/courts, racism, stupidity, War on the rational/ logic on October 15, 2009 by Editor Z

If anyone began to somehow doubt that a reservoir of bigotry and stupidity still exists, Louisiana Justice of the Peace Keith Bardwell proves that it is alive and well.

The Justice of the Peace (who obviously hasn’t received the 42 year old memo on the Supreme Court ruling of Loving Vs. the state of Virginia that ruled states must recognize interracial marriage) is refusing to give a marriage license to a black and white couple, saying he is concerned about any future children that the couple might have and their well being. Actually judging from Bardwell’s belief, if he is a father I would be much more concerned about his children.

Bardwell, and here’s a kicker emphatically states he is not racist, saying he issues licenses to black couples and white couples all the time, just thinks that interracial marriages just don’t work out.

A Louisiana justice of the peace said he refused to issue a marriage license to an interracial couple out of concern for any children the couple might have. Keith Bardwell, justice of the peace in Tangipahoa Parish, says it is his experience that most interracial marriages do not last long.

Neither Bardwell nor the couple immediately returned phone calls from The Associated Press. But Bardwell told the Daily Star of Hammond that he was not a racist.

“I do ceremonies for black couples right here in my house,” Bardwell said. “My main concern is for the children.”

Bardwell said he has discussed the topic with blacks and whites, along with witnessing some interracial marriages. He came to the conclusion that most of black society does not readily accept offspring of such relationships, and neither does white society, he said.

“I don’t do interracial marriages because I don’t want to put children in a situation they didn’t bring on themselves,” Bardwell said. “In my heart, I feel the children will later suffer.”

Someone needs to inform this racist boorish idiot that this is the 21st century and that Dixie died a long time ago. Then they need to fire him. Its amazing that people would admit to this outdated ideology that has no place in a modern civilized society, and given that he is no doubt breaking the law it is even more disgraceful that any state, county, parish, or community in America would have such a man as a public servant.

Meanwhile the couple in question is consulting with the U.S Justice Department Civil Rights division to see what they can do.

Illinois Teacher Uses term “Black Fags” says he didn’t mean to offend anyone.

In other racist and homophobia related news,Illinois High School teacher Dave Burke was teaching a economics related class when according to one openly gay High School Senior in the class Burke posed a question to the class.

“How would you feel about your tax dollars going to pay some black fag in New York to take pictures of other black fags?”

As glaring in its homophobia and racism as this statement is, Burke’s attorney wanted to make it clear, that if by some off chance anyone was offended that it was not his intention to offend anybody.

Hunter said during a lecture on tax dollars on Oct. 5, Geneva High consumer education teacher Dave Burk started talking about the National Endowment for the Arts, asking his students, “‘How would you feel about your tax dollars going to pay some black fag in New York to take pictures of other black fags?'”

Burk’s attorney, D.J. Tegeler, said Monday he was not personally aware of the terms Burk used to his classes, but that Burk apologizes for any offense.

“Mr. Burk is cooperating fully with both the principal, the dean of students and the School Board,” Tegeler said. “Mr. Burk’s biggest problem is he does not want to intentionally offend anybody and if he did, he apologizes.”

No Mr Burk, the biggest problem is that you have a poorly developed mind and a pre-civil war mentality at least in your statements. Burke was later issued a warning by the school.That’s accountability for you.

As one person later said, a bigger waste of the people’s tax dollars then the National Endowment for the Arts is this guys salary.

Digg!

Advertisements

Articles

Taking Justice and Peace Out of ‘Justice of the Peace’

In civil rights, education, Gay Rights, legal issues/law/courts, racism, stupidity, War on the rational/ logic on October 15, 2009 by Editor Z

If anyone began to somehow doubt that a reservoir of bigotry and stupidity still exists, Louisiana Justice of the Peace Keith Bardwell proves that it is alive and well.

The Justice of the Peace (who obviously hasn’t received the 42 year old memo on the Supreme Court ruling of Loving Vs. the state of Virginia that ruled states must recognize interracial marriage) is refusing to give a marriage license to a black and white couple, saying he is concerned about any future children that the couple might have and their well being. Actually judging from Bardwell’s belief, if he is a father I would be much more concerned about his children.

Bardwell, and here’s a kicker emphatically states he is not racist, saying he issues licenses to black couples and white couples all the time, just thinks that interracial marriages just don’t work out.

A Louisiana justice of the peace said he refused to issue a marriage license to an interracial couple out of concern for any children the couple might have. Keith Bardwell, justice of the peace in Tangipahoa Parish, says it is his experience that most interracial marriages do not last long.

Neither Bardwell nor the couple immediately returned phone calls from The Associated Press. But Bardwell told the Daily Star of Hammond that he was not a racist.

“I do ceremonies for black couples right here in my house,” Bardwell said. “My main concern is for the children.”

Bardwell said he has discussed the topic with blacks and whites, along with witnessing some interracial marriages. He came to the conclusion that most of black society does not readily accept offspring of such relationships, and neither does white society, he said.

“I don’t do interracial marriages because I don’t want to put children in a situation they didn’t bring on themselves,” Bardwell said. “In my heart, I feel the children will later suffer.”

Someone needs to inform this racist boorish idiot that this is the 21st century and that Dixie died a long time ago. Then they need to fire him. Its amazing that people would admit to this outdated ideology that has no place in a modern civilized society, and given that he is no doubt breaking the law it is even more disgraceful that any state, county, parish, or community in America would have such a man as a public servant.

Meanwhile the couple in question is consulting with the U.S Justice Department Civil Rights division to see what they can do.

Illinois Teacher Uses term “Black Fags” says he didn’t mean to offend anyone.

In other racist and homophobia related news,Illinois High School teacher Dave Burke was teaching a economics related class when according to one openly gay High School Senior in the class Burke posed a question to the class.

“How would you feel about your tax dollars going to pay some black fag in New York to take pictures of other black fags?”

As glaring in its homophobia and racism as this statement is, Burke’s attorney wanted to make it clear, that if by some off chance anyone was offended that it was not his intention to offend anybody.

Hunter said during a lecture on tax dollars on Oct. 5, Geneva High consumer education teacher Dave Burk started talking about the National Endowment for the Arts, asking his students, “‘How would you feel about your tax dollars going to pay some black fag in New York to take pictures of other black fags?'”

Burk’s attorney, D.J. Tegeler, said Monday he was not personally aware of the terms Burk used to his classes, but that Burk apologizes for any offense.

“Mr. Burk is cooperating fully with both the principal, the dean of students and the School Board,” Tegeler said. “Mr. Burk’s biggest problem is he does not want to intentionally offend anybody and if he did, he apologizes.”

No Mr Burk, the biggest problem is that you have a poorly developed mind and a pre-civil war mentality at least in your statements. Burke was later issued a warning by the school.That’s accountability for you.

As one person later said, a bigger waste of the people’s tax dollars then the National Endowment for the Arts is this guys salary.

Digg!

Articles

Boehner headed Response

In Gay Rights, legal issues/law/courts, Religion, stupidity on October 14, 2009 by Editor Z

House Minority leader John Boehner (R-OH)has voiced opposition to legislation that would broaden hate crimes laws that would make crimes committed based on a victim’s sexual orientation a federal offense. Boehner though says he supports current hate crimes laws that do just that for crimes motivated by a victim’s ethnicity, race, or religion.

An aide in the Minority leader’s office, said in an e-mail to CBS that this is because race, ethnicity, and religion are what he classifies as “immutable characteristics” or something that a person can’t change, while sexual orientation by his estimate is.

First off, it would be interesting to know that if sexual orientation is a conscious choice that can be made and changed, at what point did Boehner sit down and consciously decide to be straight, and also people can’t change their religion? Really? So all those Muslims, Jews, or atheists, who convert to Christianity or Catholicism just didn’t get the memo in Boehner world that they can’t really convert? So what about all those people who Pat Robertson and his 700 Club who end up up finding religion in times of hardship are what delusional? Making it all up? You may want to tell Newt Gingrich and others that. Evidently they didn’t get the memo.

Digg!

Articles

Boehner headed Response

In Gay Rights, legal issues/law/courts, Religion, stupidity on October 14, 2009 by Editor Z

House Minority leader John Boehner (R-OH)has voiced opposition to legislation that would broaden hate crimes laws that would make crimes committed based on a victim’s sexual orientation a federal offense. Boehner though says he supports current hate crimes laws that do just that for crimes motivated by a victim’s ethnicity, race, or religion.

An aide in the Minority leader’s office, said in an e-mail to CBS that this is because race, ethnicity, and religion are what he classifies as “immutable characteristics” or something that a person can’t change, while sexual orientation by his estimate is.

First off, it would be interesting to know that if sexual orientation is a conscious choice that can be made and changed, at what point did Boehner sit down and consciously decide to be straight, and also people can’t change their religion? Really? So all those Muslims, Jews, or atheists, who convert to Christianity or Catholicism just didn’t get the memo in Boehner world that they can’t really convert? So what about all those people who Pat Robertson and his 700 Club who end up up finding religion in times of hardship are what delusional? Making it all up? You may want to tell Newt Gingrich and others that. Evidently they didn’t get the memo.

Digg!

Articles

Why is McCain Such a Credible Voice on Afganistan?

In Foreign Affairs, History, neoconservatives, politics on October 12, 2009 by Editor Z

What I find interesting is that someone who voted for and has spoken fervently in support of the Iraq War which diverted resources from the war in Afghanistan and said in the long run we can just “muddle through” the war in Afghanistan; is taken seriously in this latest debate on possibly escalating troop levels there.


Don’t get me wrong, I am not one of those who thinks we should retreat from there immediately. After all Afghanistan is the war where there was a threat and where elements of Al-Queda have received aid and we should continue to battle to defeat or mollify such elements, though as we have seen in Iraq nation building is something that only bogs us down. People should remember that just because you throw money and soldiers at a problem does not automatically solve a problem, unless they have a solid strategy to guide them.

Digg!

Articles

Why is McCain Such a Credible Voice on Afganistan?

In Foreign Affairs, History, neoconservatives, politics on October 12, 2009 by Editor Z

What I find interesting is that someone who voted for and has spoken fervently in support of the Iraq War which diverted resources from the war in Afghanistan and said in the long run we can just “muddle through” the war in Afghanistan; is taken seriously in this latest debate on possibly escalating troop levels there.


Don’t get me wrong, I am not one of those who thinks we should retreat from there immediately. After all Afghanistan is the war where there was a threat and where elements of Al-Queda have received aid and we should continue to battle to defeat or mollify such elements, though as we have seen in Iraq nation building is something that only bogs us down. People should remember that just because you throw money and soldiers at a problem does not automatically solve a problem, unless they have a solid strategy to guide them.

Digg!

Articles

The Neocons will Love this, Another Millitary Attack

In science, stupidity, U.S government on October 9, 2009 by Editor Z

We are fighting a war in Iraq, a war in Afghanistan, and are several trillion dollars in debt, and we are bombing the mood. According to Dick Cheney, yes there are weapons of mass destruction and that Marvin the Martian does have ties to Al-Queda.

HUNTINGTON, W.Va. (WSAZ-TV) — The moon. It has captured the imagination of mankind since the beginning of time. So, come Friday morning… we’re going to bomb it.

NASA’s “L-CROSS” mission involves an un-manned rocket that will be followed by a separate satellite. That satellite will transmit live TV images and scientific data back to Earth.

At 7:30 a.m. (EST), the rocket will slam into a crater on the moon. Scientists hope this will cause a plume of rocks and dust and possibly ice to come flying off the moon.

Shortly after, the satellite will fly through the same plume and collect information and send it back to NASA scientists. It’s a mission that’s caught the eye of Marshall’s Physics Department Chair Nico Orsini.

“We want to find out is there water, and how much of it,” Orsini said. “So, this is all very exciting “

But there are some who are weary of the mission. Whether it’s the billions of dollars being spent, or just the actual bombing of the moon itself. But members of the scientific community say it is worth it.


Digg!